Iowa Mortgage Association - Prime Times
Dec 17, 2009
In this issue:
President's Message 2010 IMA Loan Originator Workshop 10 Facts about the Extended First-Time Homebuyer Credit House passes regulatory reform bill HPML Repayment Ability FAQ Mortgage Loan Originator Registry Rules Finalized Reg. Z Exam Procedures Updated for HPML Provisions "SAR Activity Review" focuses on mortgage fraud RESPA Revisions 303

President's Message
President's Message 2009-10 IMA President Kathy KlahnHappy Holidays everyone! I hope this finds you are as excited as I am about the changes in RESPA beginning January 1, 2010. Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks! Please keep in mind IMA continues to offer excellent educational seminars, so please take advantage of them as often as you can. Hope to see you all soon at the Spring conference. Again, have a very safe and Happy Holiday Season. Sincerely, Kathy Klahn IMA President
2010 IMA Loan Originator Workshop
2010 IMA Loan Originator WorkshopOn Tuesday, Jan. 26, 2010, the Iowa Mortgage Association will host the 2010 IMA Loan Originator Workshop featuring Mike Baker. The workshop will take place at the Stoney Creek Inn in Johnston.Highlights of the seminar include: - How to collect and transform every lead into a closed loan
- Understanding the most important, highest payoff task in building your business
- A simple easy-to-implement business plan that can quadruple your business
- How to maximize your business opportunities for more referrals
- How to leverage technology to maximize all of the above
- The top fi ve reasons loan offi cers fail and how to avoid them
- Why "Closing the Sale" is over-used, over-rated, and old-school
- How to build your business when you don't seem to have the time
- The core workplace competencies that guarantee success
Mike Baker is a nationally-recognized mortgage industry leader. He started his career as a loan officer in 1985 and quickly became one of the nation's top performers in personal loan production. His business model for building mortgage branches worked so well that he's experienced tremendous success in recruiting, hiring and retaining top performers in several states. This success took Mike on the road, where he has conducted more than 700 workshops and seminars around the United States and Canada. He has written over 100 articles for national publications such as "Mortgage Originator Magazine", "Broker Magazine", "The Mortgage Report", "Broker/Banker Magazine," and "Scotsman Guide."Registration: IMA Members $135.00 Nonmembers $215.00 Register online at www.iowama.org.
10 Facts about the Extended First-Time Homebuyer Credit
10 Facts about the Extended First-Time Homebuyer Credit In early November the First-Time Homebyer Tax Credit was extended to provide the $8,000 homebuyer credit to contracts signed by April 30, 2010, and closed by June 30, 2010. The program was expanded, creating a $6,500 credit for homebuyers moving to a different house after living in their home for five of the last eight years. It also applies to contracts signed by April 30, 2010, and closed by June 30, 2010, and raises the income cap to $150,000 adjusted gross income for single filers and $225,000 for joint filers. Mortgage lenders should advise home buyers to consult with their IRS tax professional regarding their eligibility for the expanded tax credit program. Here are the top 10 things the IRS wants consumers to know about the expanded credit and the qualifications that must be met in order to qualify for it. - You must buy - or enter into a binding contract to buy a principal residence - on or before April 30, 2010.
- If you enter into a binding contract by April 30, 2010 you must close on the home on or before June 30, 2010.
- For qualifying purchases in 2010, you will have the option of claiming the credit on either your 2009 or 2010 return.
- A long-time resident of the same home can now qualify for a reduced credit. You can qualify for the credit if you've lived in the same principal residence for any five-consecutive year period during the eight-year period that ended on the date the new home is purchased and the settlement date is after November 6, 2009.
- The maximum credit for long-time residents is $6,500. However, married individuals filing separately are limited to $3,250.
- People with higher incomes can now qualify for the credit. The new law raises the income limits for homes purchased after November 6, 2009. The full credit is available to taxpayers with modified adjusted gross incomes up to $125,000, or $225,000 for joint filers.
- The IRS will issue a December 2009 revision of Form 5405 to claim this credit. The December 2009 form must be used for homes purchased after November 6, 2009 - whether the credit is claimed for 2008 or for 2009 - and for all home purchases that are claimed on 2009 returns.
- No credit is available if the purchase price of the home exceeds $800,000.
- The purchaser must be at least 18 years old on the date of purchase. For a married couple, only one spouse must meet this age requirement.
- A dependent is not eligible to claim the credit.
Information provided by the IRS. For more information about the expanded First-Time Home Buyer Credit, visit www.IRS.gov/recovery.
House passes regulatory reform bill
House passes regulatory reform billBill would require mortgage originators to main 5 percent of the risk of a loan sold to the secondary marketOn Friday, Dec. 11, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (H.R. 4173) by a vote of 223 to 202. The bill creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Agency to set and enforce industry-wide rules for consumer protection and addresses issues of systemic risk posed by large financial companies. The bill was opposed by many trade groups in the financial services industry including the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), Iowa Bankers Association (IBA) and American Bankers Association (ABA). Following passage of the bill, MBA Chairman Robert E. Story expressed his disappointment. "Unfortunately, we are not in a position where we can support this bill as currently constituted. Throughout this process, we have worked with members of the House on both sides of the aisle to enhance their understanding of the possible negative implications this bill has for current and future homeowners, the lending industry and the mortgage market as a whole," Story said in a news release. "Regrettably, the House moved forward and passed a bill that could adversely impact borrowers and lenders alike. By not creating a uniform, national regulatory standard, the bill continues the conflicting and confusing patchwork of state and local laws that result in increased costs for borrowers." Another concern included in the bill is a requirement that mortgage originators maintain 5% of the risk of a loan sold to the secondary market. "The risk retention provisions could make unsustainable the business models of hundreds of non-depository, independent mortgage banking firms that offer up more than a quarter of the mortgages made in this country today. On top of that, depository institutions will have to restrain their lending to meet the new requirements. Eliminating that much lending capacity will surely increase costs and limit borrowing options for many qualified homebuyers," Story said. The industry was pleased that the House voted down a bankruptcy cram down amendment which was strongly opposed by the MBA, American Bankers Association, Iowa Bankers Association and other trade groups. The amendment would have allowed judges to revise mortgage contracts in bankruptcy. The regulatory reform bill will now move to the Senate. The Iowa Mortgage Association will continue to keep members informed on the status of the legislation.
HPML Repayment Ability FAQ
HPML Repayment Ability FAQThe Federal Reserve Board (the Board) on Nov. 9, 2009 issued Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding compliance with Regulation Z’s new repayment ability rule for higher-priced balloon mortgage loans. The FAQs clarify that the new rules do not ban higher-priced balloon loans with terms of less than seven years, and that creditors do not have to verify that the consumer has assets and/or income at the time of consummation that would be sufficient to pay the balloon payment when it comes due.This official Board clarification comes after extensive communications with Federal Reserve staff, including a letter submitted by American Bankers Association on Nov. 4th, explaining that the Board’s recent regulations are having the unintended consequence of prohibiting certain short-term balloon notes, and generally diminishing credit availability. The Board’s guidance indicates a creditor has a presumption of compliance with the repayment ability rule if the creditor follows certain procedures, including verifying the borrower’s income. Creditors extending balloon loans with terms of seven years or more can achieve the presumption of compliance if the procedures are followed and if so, the creditor need not consider the borrower’s ability to repay the balloon payment. However, for some products a creditor cannot achieve the presumption of compliance even if it follows the specified procedures; these products include balloon loans with terms of less than seven years (“short-term balloon loans”). (The guidance does note, however, if a creditor is unconditionally obligated to renew a balloon loan, the creditor may use the full term of the renewal to determine whether the balloon loan is excluded from the presumption of compliance.) Exclusion of short-term balloon loans from the presumption of compliance has led creditors to ask how they can make these loans and comply with the repayment ability rule. As a result of these creditor inquiries, the Board issued the following four FAQs: 1. Question: Does the rule prohibit short-term balloon loans that are higher-priced mortgage loans? Answer: No. However, the creditor must use prudent underwriting standards and, after considering consumers’ income, employment, obligations and assets other than the collateral, the creditor should determine that the value of the collateral (the home) is not the basis for repaying the obligation (including the balloon payment). 2. Question: Does that mean the creditor must verify that the consumer has assets and/or income at the time of consummation that would be sufficient to pay the balloon payment when it comes due? Answer: No, such a requirement would effectively ban short-term balloon loans. If the Board had intended to ban these products it would have done so explicitly. 3. Question: What must the creditor do, then, to verify the borrower’s ability to repay a short-term balloon loan? Answer: In addition to verifying the consumer’s ability to make regular monthly payments, a creditor should verify that the consumer would likely be able to satisfy the balloon payment obligation by refinancing the loan or through income or assets other than the collateral. 4. Question: How does the creditor verify, when it originates a short-term balloon loan, whether the consumer could qualify for a refinancing before the balloon payment is due? Answer: The creditor has an affirmative duty to engage in prudent underwriting. Thus, the creditor should consider factors such as the loan-to-value ratio and the borrower’s debt-to-income ratio or residual income—all as of the time of consummation. A borrower with a high debt-to-income ratio, and/or with little or no equity in the property, will be less likely to be able to refinance the loan before the balloon payment comes due than a borrower with lower debt-to-income and loan-to-value ratios. The creditor is not required to predict the consumer’s future financial circumstances, interest rate environment and home value. Click here to read the full text of the Board’s Consumer Affairs Letter CA 09-12 on short-term balloon loans.
Mortgage Loan Originator Registry Rules Finalized
Mortgage Loan Originator Registry Rules FinalizedThe federal regulatory agencies have adopted final rules to implement the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (the S.A.F.E. Act). The S.A.F.E. Act requires an employee of a bank, savings association, credit union or Farm Credit System (FCS) institution and their subsidiaries that are regulated by a federal banking agency or the FCA who acts as a residential mortgage loan originator to register with the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry, obtain a unique identifier and maintain this registration.The final rule further provides that Agency-regulated institutions must: - Require their employees who act as residential mortgage loan originators to comply with the S.A.F.E. Act’s requirements to register and obtain a unique identifier, and
- Adopt and follow written policies and procedures designed to assure compliance with these requirements.
- The Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) and the American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators (AARMR) have developed and maintain a Web-based system, the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System (NMLS), for the state licensing of mortgage loan originators in participating states. Mortgage loan originators in these states electronically complete a single uniform form (the MU4 form). The Federal banking agencies, through the FFIEC, are working with CSBS to modify the NMLS so that it can accept registrations from mortgage loan originators employed by Agency-regulated institutions. This modified registry will be renamed the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry. The existing NMLS was not designed to support the federal registration of Agency-regulated institution employees, who are not required to obtain additional authorization from the appropriate Federal agency to engage in mortgage loan origination activities that are permissible for the Agency-regulated institution. Accordingly, the system must be modified to accommodate the differences between the requirements for state licensing/registration and Federal registration. These modifications and enhancements require careful analysis and raise complex legal and system development issues that the Agencies are addressing.
The Agencies will publicly announce the date on which the Registry will begin accepting registrations, which will mark the beginning of the 180-day period during which employees of Agency-supervised institutions must register. This, in effect, provides institutions with an implementation period longer than 180 days as institutions and their employees can begin to implement the final rule’s requirements before the Registry is operational (i.e., develop policies and procedures, train employees, gather information needed for registration, and program and implement system controls). The system is not expected to be available to accept registrations until sometime in 2010. When fully operational, mortgage loan originators and their Agency-regulated institution employers are expected to have access to the Registry, seven days a week, to establish and maintain their registrations.The final rule implementing the mortgage loan originator registry can be found on the FDIC website at http://www.fdic.gov/news/board/2009nov12no8.pdf.The Iowa Mortgage Association will be providing more information on the final mortgage loan originator registry in upcoming months.
Reg. Z Exam Procedures Updated for HPML Provisions
Reg. Z Exam Procedures Updated for HPML ProvisionsAs a result of recent revisions to Reg. Z to prohibit unfair, abusive or deceptive lending and servicing practices for residential mortgage loans, the examination procedures for the Truth In Lending Act (TILA), implemented by Reg. Z, have been revised. The revised examination procedures were developed on an interagency basis.The revisions to Reg. Z exam procedures address reviewing a lender’s compliance with Reg. Z’s newly-defined category of “higher-priced mortgage loans” rules including assessing an institution’s ability to identify “higher-priced mortgage loans” as well as its new requirements concerning repayment ability, income verification and prepayment penalties, escrows and evasion of the rules. Finally, the procedures also incorporate Reg. Z’s new protections for all closed-end mortgages secured by a consumer’s principal dwelling, including a prohibition on abusive servicing practices. In addition, the procedures test compliance with the additional advertising standards for all mortgage loans and prohibits deceptive or misleading advertising practices. The revised examination procedures can be found online at http://files.ots.treas.gov/422310.pdf and the appendix to the procedures at http://files.ots.treas.gov/422311.pdf.
"SAR Activity Review" focuses on mortgage fraud
"SAR Activity Review" focuses on mortgage fraud Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced the release of the sixteenth issue of “The SAR Activity Review - Trends, Tips & Issues” in mid-October. This issue continues FinCEN’s focus on mortgage fraud as well as the most efficient way to file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs), and other BSA data through e-filing. FinCEN also issued an advisory on filing SARs regarding TARP-related programs. “The SAR Activity Review” can be found online at http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/files/sar_tti_16.pdf. | |  |
RESPA Revisions 303
RESPA Revisions 303 Ronette Schlatter, CRCMEditor’s Note: This article is the third in a series of three discussing the revisions to RESPA effective Jan. 1, 2010. The first two articles appeared in the October and November 2009 issues of The Disclosure and discussed revised definitions, completion of the new standardized Good Faith Estimate (GFE) and the rules related to changing the GFE once it has been provided to the applicant. This article will discuss the proper completion of the new HUD settlement statement. This summary is based upon the instructions for completing the settlement statement as found in the Nov. 17, 2008 Federal Register at and HUD’s Questions and Answers (Q&A) on the RESPA revisions.The New HUD Statement While the HUD statement is “new,” some things have not changed. The HUD statement completion continues to be the responsibility of the settlement agent and must itemize all the actual charges imposed upon the borrower and the seller as part of the transaction. Either the HUD–1 or the HUD–1A, as appropriate, must be used for every RESPA-covered transaction, unless its use is specifically exempted. RESPA has maintained its exemption for open-end lines of credit (home-equity plans) covered by the Truth in Lending Act from the HUD statement requirement. The revised HUD statement has an additional page containing comparison charts and a loan terms summary. Many of the HUD lines also reference the GFE line the applicable fee was disclosed on. In addition, the HUD instructions specifically indicate some fees must be itemized outside the columns with an aggregate total detailed in the column. Therefore, statement preparers must carefully review the instructions. Disclosure of Actual Charges The general rule for completion of the HUD is that the statement should reflect the “actual charge” incurred for the settlement service. However, HUD introduces a new provision that permits lenders to assess an “average charge” rather than “actual charge.” Use of the new “average charge” method may be suitable in cases where the lender does not know the exact fee; for example, due to volume discount pricing. The average charge for a settlement service can be no more than the average amount paid for a settlement service by one settlement service provider to another settlement service provider for a particular class of transactions. The total amounts paid by borrowers and sellers for a settlement service based on the use of an average charge may not exceed the total amounts paid to the providers of that service for the particular class of transactions. HUD provides for a rather complex manner in which to determine a lender’s average charge and requires lenders to re-evaluate the average interest charge at least every six months. Use of an average charge is not permitted for any settlement service if the charge for the service is based on the loan amount or property value. (E.g., an average charge may not be used for transfer taxes, interest charges, reserves, escrow or any type of insurance.) Should a lender elect to use average charge pricing, it must retain all documentation used to calculate the average charge for a particular class of transactions for at least three years after any settlement for which that average charge was used. Items Paid on Behalf of the Borrower Generally, charges that are paid for by the seller must be shown in the seller’s column on the second page of the HUD–1 (unless paid outside closing), and charges that are paid for by the borrower must be shown in the borrower’s column (unless paid outside closing). However, if a seller pays for a charge that was included on the GFE, the charge should be listed in the borrower’s column on page two of the HUD–1. That charge should then be offset by listing a credit in that amount to the borrower on lines 204–209 on page one of the HUD–1, and by a charge to the seller in lines 506–509 on page one of the HUD–1. If a lender (other than for no-cost loans), real estate agent, other settlement service provider or other person pays for a charge that was included on the GFE, the charge should be listed in the borrower’s column on page two of the HUD–1. An offsetting credit should then be included on page one of the HUD–1 in the 200 series, identifying the party paying the charge. While the GFE does not permit items to be shown as Paid Outside of Closing (POC), the HUD does permit it. Charges paid outside of settlement by the borrower, seller, loan originator, real estate agent or any other person, must be included on the HUD–1 but marked POC and must not be included in computing totals. POC items must not be placed in the borrower or seller columns, but rather on the appropriate line outside the columns. The settlement agent must indicate whether POC items are paid for by the Borrower, Seller, or some other party by marking the items paid for by whoever made the payment as ‘‘POC” with the party making the payment identified in parentheses, such as ‘‘POC (borrower)’’ or ‘‘POC (seller).’’ It is also permissible to use POC(B); POC(S); and POC(L) if a key explaining the abbreviation is provided. Line 801 Record ALL charges received by the loan originator, except any charge for the specific interest rate chosen (points) on Line 801. Include any amounts received for origination services, including administrative and processing services, performed by or on behalf of the loan originator on this line. Note each item is not individually itemized; rather, a total amount is detailed to the left of the column referencing Block 1 on the GFE. HUD’s Q&A indicate a loan originator should designate any origination point(s) paid on Line 801 for IRS tax reporting purposes. The designation can follow “Our Origination Charge” either by adding the language “Includes Origination Point (__% or $__)” or by placing an asterisk (*) and adding the language at the bottom of the page. Line 802 Line 802 is used to detail the charge or credit for the interest rate selected and is also disclosed to the left of the borrower’s column. For example, if the borrower bought down the interest rate, discount points would be disclosed as an additional charge to the borrower; or if the lender priced the loan above the PAR rate to reduce borrower upfront costs, a credit should be shown on line 802. Indirect payments from a lender to a mortgage broker must be also be included as a credit on Line 802 and may not be disclosed as POC. Line 802 is also used to detail lender credits for “no cost” loans. When ‘‘no cost’’ refers only to the loan originator’s fees, the amounts shown in Lines 801 and 802 should offset, so that the charge shown on Line 803 is zero. When ‘‘no cost’’ includes third party settlement services, the credit shown in Line 802 will more than offset the amount shown in Line 801. The amount shown in Line 803 will be a negative number to offset the settlement charges paid indirectly through the loan originator. Note: After the GFE is issued, if a lender (other than for no cost loans) or other person pays for a charge that was included on the GFE, the charge should be listed in the borrower’s column on page two of the HUD-1, with an offsetting credit reported on page one of the HUD-1 in the 200 series, identifying the party paying the charge. Line 803, the Adjusted Origination, is then detailed in the borrower’s column on line 803 and references GFE line A. Required Services We Select The remaining lines in the 800 series are used to detail providers required by the lender and disclosed in Block 4 on the GFE. Each settlement service provider must be identified by name and the amount paid recorded either inside the columns or as paid to the provider outside closing (‘‘POC’’), as described in the General Instructions. Additional numbered lines can be added as needed. Title Services Lines 1100 through 1108 are used to detail title charges and charges by attorneys and closing or settlement agents. The title charges include a variety of services performed by title companies or others, and include fees directly related to the transfer of title (e.g., title examination, title search, and document preparation), fees for title insurance, and third party fees for conducting the closing, notary fees, and delivery fees related to the services covered in this series. The aggregate total of all “title charges” is disclosed in the borrower’s column on line 1101. Disbursements to third parties must be broken out in the appropriate lines or in blank lines in the series, and amounts paid to these third parties must be shown outside of the columns if included in Line 1101. Charges not included in Line 1101 must be listed in the columns. Additional lines can be added to this section of the HUD for title-related services such as abstract costs and title opinion fees. Recording Fees The 1200 to 1206 series details government recording and transfer charges. Any amounts that are charged to the seller and that were not included on the GFE must be listed in the seller’s columns. Line 1201 should record the total government recording charges paid by the borrower and the amount must be listed in the column. The subsequent lines are then used to itemize the various fees outside of the columns. Line 1206 and additional sequentially numbered lines may be used to record specific itemized third party charges not listed in earlier lines for government recording and transfer services, but the amounts must be listed outside the columns and added to the total on line 1201 if paid by the borrower. Additional Settlement Charges Line 1301 and additional sequentially numbered lines are to be used to record required services that the borrower can shop for, such as fees for survey, pest inspection or other similar inspections. Each third party service the borrower can shop for is to be itemized in the 1300 series outside the column with the total amount detailed on line 1301 in the column. The extra lines in the 1300 series may be used to record additional itemized settlement charges that are not included in a specific category, such as fees for structural and environmental inspections; pre-sale inspections of heating, plumbing or electrical equipment; or insurance or warranty coverage. These optional services are often purchased by the borrower should be individually itemized in the borrower’s column. Comparison Chart & Tolerance Errors A new feature on the HUD statement is a series of “comparison charts” on page three of the HUD. The comparison charts must be prepared using the exact information and amounts from the GFE and the actual settlement charges shown on the HUD–1/1A Settlement Statement. There are three charts: - Charges that cannot increase;
- Charges that in total cannot increase more than 10%; and
- Charges that can change.
If any charges at settlement exceed the charges listed on the GFE by more than the permitted tolerances, it is considered a Section 5 violation of RESPA. HUD-1 Lines 801, 802 and 803 each have separate 0% tolerance threshold. The 10% tolerance applies to the total of all charges in the category of fees that cannot increase by more than 10%.A settlement agent is not required to stop a closing if an error has occurred. However, if a lender is aware of a tolerance violation, it is best to resolve the error prior to closing if possible. If a tolerance error does occur, the lender has 30 days following settlement to “cure the violation.” In order to cure a tolerance violation, a revised HUD statement must be prepared that states the actual charges paid by the borrower and seller and provided to all parties. If the loan originator pays for a portion of a charge to “cure” a tolerance violation, HUD’s Q&A describe two methods to disclose the lender payments on the revised HUD statement: Disclose the actual charge in the appropriate borrower’s column on the HUD-1 and provide a “lump sum” credit on a blank line in 204-209 with a description of the tolerance category cure. (E.g., Cure for 10% Tolerance Category”). The comparison chart on page 3 of the HUD-1 should also reflect the credit given for that service to cure the potential violation in the appropriate tolerance category. Or the lender may break out the total actual charge on the HUD-1 indicating part of the fee is being paid by the borrower and then on a separate blank line the applicable series, note that the lender has made a POC payment of the remainder charge amount (specifying that amount) to correct a potential tolerance violation. When using this method, the lender should only detail that portion of the fee actually paid by the borrower on the comparison chart. Along with the revised HUD statement, the borrower must be reimbursed for any amounts paid in excess of tolerance limits within 30 days following settlement. It should be noted the lender/loan originator is ultimately responsible for resolving tolerance violations. The lender cannot pressure a settlement agent or other service provider to reduce their charges or otherwise “cover the difference” to bring the costs into compliance with the tolerances as a condition of receiving future referrals; such a practice would constitute a section 8 violation of RESPA. HUD’s Q&A even provide contact information on whom to report such suspected Section 8 violations. This article only highlights the major changes to the HUD statement. Lenders and settlement agents are well advised to carefully review both the instructions for completion of the settlement statement as well as HUD’s Q&A on the settlement statement and cure process. Ronette Schlatter is Senior Compliance Coordinator for the Iowa Bankers Association. This article was originally published in the December issue of "The Disclosure," the Iowa Bankers Association's monthly Compliance magazine.
To remove yourself from this mailing list, click here.
|